Some Simple Ways to Create a Healthier Workplace

This document may be printed, photocopied, and disseminated freely with attribution. All content is the property of the McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership.

Do you spend all of your time trying to find and hire that perfect staff person, just to have them leave after a few months? Its probably not the pay, and it’s probably not lack of opportunity for advancement. Studies show that some of the top reasons for leaving organizations include feeling undervalued and trying to work within a poor company culture.


Leaders can take action to develop supportive work environments, leading to happier employees and decreased turnover.


Here are a few simple ideas that cost nothing and might make a difference in staff retention.


CREATE A CULTURE OF RECOGNITION AND FEEDBACK


Do your teachers know how they positively affect the children in their care? Point it out to them every day. Catch them being difference-makers. When you visit the classrooms, make note of the small, seemingly insignificant things they do that make a difference. These might include a smile when a child wakes up from a nap or a gentle touch on the back to calm a child to sleep. Even if your staff member has areas they need to work on, starting conversations with what they are doing right will set the tone for any discussion. You might see that if you do this, others will catch each other making a difference, and it will spread throughout your program. How you recognize this is up to you: a small note, a mention in a group setting, or in a one-on-one meeting, as long as you recognize it.


Another way of creating a healthy workplace is giving all staff a time and place to reflect. Sometimes, we call it  Reflective Supervision, other times it’s called One-on-Ones, but regardless of the terminology, we all need someone to reflect with and discuss what is going well and what is not. A healthy workplace will build in time for each staff person, including the support staff and even the kitchen and maintenance staff, to have regular, weekly, protected time with their supervisor. If this doesn’t happen, as human beings, we will turn to our co-workers. This is where unproductive negativity can start. Reflecting with someone who has the power to make changes or who can go to those who do is healthy. Reflecting with our coworkers leads to negativity and complaining, and it rarely creates positive change.


CREATE A POSITIVE WORK CULTURE- DO NOT TOLERATE GOSSIP, NEGATIVITY, OR CLIQUES


We have all worked at a place where negativity was allowed or even promoted. As a program leader, you can squelch non-productive negative talk. You are responsible for creating the culture of your team, and your positive-thinking staff will appreciate this, so choose positivity as your new norm. This can mean that if staff have complaints of any kind, they can be directed to express them only to those who have the power to make the changes, most likely a supervisor. Making complaints, rather than suggestions, in a meeting or other group setting or to one another will set the tone for your team’s culture in a negative way. This will likely make newer staff uncomfortable and cause them to wonder if they made the right decision. There is no upside to allowing negative talk or complaints to flow freely. Let it be known that if someone needs to vent, it should be to their immediate supervisor one-on-one.


Create a Gossip-Free Environment


Gossip has been around since human existence in some way or another. We all have experienced it. As a leader, you can prohibit it in your center. You have every right to make your environment gossip-free. First, check yourself and make sure that you are refraining from using it. You will probably need to define “gossip” so everyone understands what you mean. You will also want this to apply to parents and families. To truly create a gossip-free zone, it should apply to everyone who enters your center. You might find that everyone or nearly everyone will appreciate this. As a group, you can devise strategies to use, such as just excusing yourself when someone starts to gossip. They will get the hint, and it will soon be part of the culture of your center. You might see that this also helps to eliminate cliques. People want to work in a place that makes them feel welcome, supported, and appreciated. Fairness and positivity are essential requirements for this to happen.


Create a Clique-Free Environment


We all have had feelings of being on the outside of something. We have seen that there are favorite people in an organization. Sometimes, it might be us; other times, it might not. Since the opportunity for advancement is one aspect of staff retention, forming cliques works against this idea for many people. As a leader in an organization, know that fairness to all is noticed if it happens and is noticed if it is not the case. One example I recall in my past experiences was staff birthdays. How do we recognize them? There was no policy for this, so if someone was well-known and well-liked, a group of their friends would bring a cake, get a card and balloons, and have a little celebration at lunchtime. For less known or popular staff, the birthdays were passed by with little or no recognition. One of the first changes I made was to work as a group to develop a policy that would apply to all staff birthdays. It ended up being a sign-up to bring a cake to celebrate all the staff who had birthdays that month–nothing less, nothing more, all equal.


As a leader, check yourself for the appearance of “favorite employees.” Ensure that you treat all staff equally, even if you have a personal relationship with some and not others. All staff must feel equal in your eyes, or retaining good employees will be difficult. Staff must feel that there will be no bias when it comes to promotions and that promotions will be based on performance and skill, not favoritism.


CREATE GROUP NORMS



The culture within an organization is crucial, and a healthy environment plays a major role in morale and commitment to an organization. The organizational culture can drive the norms of meetings. Group norms are a great way to create a healthy environment. As a group, develop norms that fit your organization. Here are some I have used in the past:


  • Use “I” statements, remembering that you speak only for yourself, not for a group.
  • Refrain from interrupting, dominating the conversation, and side conversations.
  • Everyone has a voice, and everyone is encouraged to contribute in meetings.
  • We will be mindful of each other’s time, so we will start and end meetings on time.
  • Refrain from gossip and cliques. No one is to be excluded; everyone is included.


Throughout all of our differences lies a universal hope for a positive workplace. No one starts a job hoping it will end. We all want to like our place of employment, and as leaders, we set the tone for our work culture. Introducing recognition of positivity will promote positivity, and setting norms will keep negativity at bay. Your workplace can be a vicious circle of negativity, or it can be a virtuous circle of positivity; it’s up to you!


Pamela Costakis, MS Ed., is the Quality Assessment Manager for the McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership at National Louis University (NLU), where she manages the two state assessment teams that conduct classroom and program assessments throughout the state of Illinois. Pam holds a baccalaureate degree in psychology from Bradley University and a graduate degree in early childhood education from Northern Illinois University. She also has a certificate from Erikson Institute in Infant Specialist Studies. Prior to joining the McCormick Center, Pam was a nursery school teacher, an early childhood special education teacher, family childcare network coordinator, state pre-K director of a large child care center, center director of a therapeutic preschool, center director of a child care center for women in treatment, and a master teacher in a Head Start center. The majority of her work has been with underserved populations.

By Robyn Kelton, M.A. June 27, 2025
INTRODUCTION Turnover rates in child care are among the highest in education, with over 160,000 workforce openings predicted annually (Bassok et al., 2014; Doromal et al., 2022; Joughin, 2021; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025). While some turnover is expected and even necessary, the levels of turnover experienced in the field of early childhood education and care (ECEC) are not only alarmingly high but deeply problematic. In 2021, a national survey conducted by the National Association for the Education of Young Children found that over 80% of child care centers were experiencing a staffing shortage, with the majority of those programs reporting one-to-five open roles, but 15% reporting between six and 15 open roles (NAEYC, 2021). Staffing shortages result in lost revenue, financial uncertainty, and program instability, often forcing administrators to operate below capacity and/or under reduced hours (NAEYC, 2021; NAEYC, 2024; Zero to Three, 2024). Limited enrollment slots and classroom and program closures lead to increased waiting lists (Zero to Three, 2024; Carrazana, 2023). In turn, families are placed in a highly vulnerable position of needing to leave the workforce to stay home with their child or turn to potentially unsafe or unregulated child care. Moreover, increased turnover in classrooms interrupts continuity of care and disrupts the relationships built between children and their educators (Reidt-Parker, J., & Chainski, M. J. (2015). Research has begun to highlight some of the programmatic and personnel characteristics predictive of increased staff turnover in ECEC programs. Low wages are most commonly identified as a strong predictor of turnover (Amadon et al., 2023; Bryant et al., 2023; Fee, 2024; Guevara, 2022; Totenhagen et al., 2016). However, workforce advocates and some researchers have begun to expand conversations on compensation to explore the impact the profession’s general lack of benefits such as paid time off, access to health insurance, and retirement benefits has on retention (e.g., Amadon et al., 2023; Bryant et al., 2023; Fee, 2024; Lucas, 2023). While informative, this body of work has typically approached benefits as binary variables (i.e., have or do not have) rather than reflect the spectrum on which benefits are commonly offered (e.g., the number of days off, the percent of insurance covered by the employer, and levels of retirement matching funds). This Research Note aims to expand on previous work investigating the relationship between benefits and turnover by exploring the possibility of a more nuanced relationship between the variables to determine if the level of benefits offered impacts turnover rates. METHOD This study used data collected via formal Program Administration Scale, 3rd Edition (PAS-3) assessments conducted by Certified PAS-3 Assessors between 2023 and 2025. To become certified, PAS-3 assessors must first achieve reliability (a score of at least 86%) on a test conducted after four days of training on the tool. Next, they must conduct two PAS assessments within three months of reliability training. PAS-3 national anchors reviewed the completed assessments for consistency, accuracy, and completeness. The study analyzed data from 133 PAS-3 assessments collected during the certification process across 12 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Mariana Islands.  Measures Data for this study were collected using the PAS-3, a valid and reliable tool used to measure and improve Whole Leadership practices in center-based programs (Talan, Bella, Jorde Bloom, 2022). The PAS-3 includes 25 items, each composed of 2-5 indicator strands and scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = inadequate, 3 = minimal, 5 = good, and 7 = excellent). Item scores are averaged to determine a mean PAS-3 score. Of particular interest to this study is Item 5: Benefits. Item 5 measures employee access to health insurance and considers what percentage of the cost is paid by the employer, the total number of paid time off days within the first and fifth years of employment, access to a retirement plan, and the percentage at which the employer will match the employee’s contribution. Last, Item 5 explores provisions made to cover the costs of staff’s professional development. Non-applicable is allowed as a response for indicators related to health insurance and retirement if there are no full-time staff employed by the program. Sample Program enrollment ranged in size from four children to 285, with a mean enrollment of 65 and a median of 55. Total program staff for the sample ranged from two to 44 staff, with an average of just under 14 staff (13.93) and a standard deviation of 8.80. Table 1 below provides a detailed breakdown of staff by role and full-time and part-time status.
Show More