McCormick Institute for Early Childhood

This document may be printed, photocopied, and disseminated freely with attribution. All content is the property of the McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership.

These past 18 months have been a period of reckoning for the early childhood education and care (ECEC) community. Think about the metaphor regarding perspective: What do you see, the “forest” (in the background) or the “trees” (in the foreground and the focus of attention)? Serving young children and their families during the time of COVID-19 has revealed substantial inequities for the ECEC workforce and an overall instability in our profession. We are at an inflection point. Attention to equity and social justice and attention to the quality of the teaching and leading workforce are vital to our profession’s sustainability and ability to meet the needs of young children and families. We must see the forest and the trees at the same time. Now is the time to advocate for policies and investments that advance equity and quality.


The McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership at National Louis University is currently engaged in focus group research maintaining the twin foci of promoting social justice and racial equity and advancing a unified professional framework for the preparation and support of cross-sector ECEC program administrators—directors, principals, and family child care professionals—working in centers, schools, and homes. The Leading with Equity—Building Leaders project, supported by the Foundation for Child Development, examines the racial equity and social justice impact of the Five Consensus Recommendations. What is unique about this research is that it considers the racial equity and social justice impact of professional preparation and support recommendations before promoting any changes to current policy at the local, state, or federal levels.


The Leading with Equity—Building Leaders project furthers and deepens the consensus-building research conducted last year. The purpose of the initial research project, also supported by the Foundation for Child Development, was to build consensus on the need for a unified professional framework for all ECEC program leaders, determine the minimum professional preparation requirements and core competencies for all ECEC program leaders, and establish criteria for compensation parity for program leaders across ECEC sectors and settings.


At the culmination of 14 virtual sessions with 207 racially and ethnically diverse ECEC leaders coming from 32 states and the District of Columbia, consensus was reached on five recommendations pertaining to a unified professional framework for ECEC leaders. The online platform (Advanced Strategy Lab) provided opportunity for simultaneous and anonymous responses to both structured and open-ended questions. Participants were asked to rate the anonymous responses visible to all. The highest-ranked responses were then included in subsequent and iterative sessions. This unique methodology to build consensus (reached when at least 80% of respondents support or strongly support a specific recommendation) created an inclusive shared space in which all voices were equally influential. However, it was not possible to disaggregate the responses by race or ethnicity to understand the degree of agreement with each recommendation by those leaders representing under-resourced communities of color.


The current Leading with Equity—Building Leaders research project is designed to answer the following questions. To what degree do leaders of color support the Five Consensus Recommendations? Are there any perceived barriers to achieving equitable outcomes if the recommendations are implemented? If so, what specific workplace strategies, higher education supports, or policy changes are needed prior to implementation of the recommendations in order to ensure equitable outcomes? With this research, the McCormick Center addresses the need for both increased equity and enhanced quality. There is no either/or dichotomy—both the forest and the trees are seen and valued.


The results of this research study will be available in the summer of 2022. Please contact Teri Talan at the McCormick Center, teri.talan@nl.edu, if you want more information about the research questions or design.


Dr. Teri Talan, J.D., Ed.D., holds the Michael W. Louis Chair and is senior policy advisor at the McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership and professor of early childhood education at National Louis University (NLU). She promotes action by state and national policymakers on early childhood workforce and program administration issues. Previously, she led a child advocacy organization and an early childhood program accredited by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). She holds a law degree from Northwestern University as well as a master’s degree in early childhood leadership and advocacy and a doctorate in adult and continuing education from NLU. She is coauthor of the of the Program Administration ScaleBusiness Administration Scale for Family Child CareEscala de Evaluación de la Administración de NegociosWho’s Caring for the Kids? The Status of the Early Childhood Workforce in Illinois; and Closing the Leadership Gap.

By Leslie Layman November 12, 2025
BY LESLIE LAYMAN Introduction: Building on Intentional Design In part one of this “Scaffolded Beginnings” series , Emilie Austin, McCormick Institute for Early Childhood’s Manager of Learning Design Experience, spoke to the importance of intentional design and scaffolding to support new employees in deepening their learning during orientation. This second part of the series covers the importance of operational leadership in helping that learning to “stick” so that employees can successfully apply skills learned in orientation to their new roles. Many organizations structure orientation as a “big day” of meeting people, reviewing handbooks and procedures, and maybe sharing coffee and sweets. On that day, new employees are taking on a new role, expectations, and culture while trying to understand and memorize functional processes and procedures. Going beyond the big day by applying intentional environmental design and contextual, participatory learning theory in your day-to-day helps your employees own and grow into their place in your organization’s culture. Applying a Reggio-Inspired Approach to Onboarding Intentional leaders are responsible for both the administrative leadership of the workplace environment and the strategic leadership and guidance of the organization. Both areas are involved in scaffolding new employees from understanding what they have learned during orientation to applying that information in their new role throughout and beyond the onboarding and training process (Talan, Masterson, & Bella). Loris Malaguzzi’s Reggio approach to early childhood education is a useful framework for thinking of and planning for new employees as learners and participants in the environment, as well as educators and carers of children and families. “To make a lovable school, industrious, inventive, liveable, documentable and communicable, a place of research, learning, re-cognition and reflection, where children, teachers and families feel well - is our point of arrival.” -Loris Malaguzzi (Sourced from: Institutionzione del Comune di Reggio Emilia ) Each of the Reggio Values can be used to create a shared learning space where educators and children can thrive. A few examples include: Children are active protagonists in their growing processes And so are adult learners! Find ways to make new employees the “lead” in the story of their onboarding. New employees can participate in individualized goal setting to help them feel in control of their professional development. Progettazione/Designing People of all ages learn by doing. Support new employees to participate in designing training and learning experiences rather than providing only pre-planned or scripted training. The Hundred Languages People bring all of themselves, their experiences, and their ways of being to learning and work environments, and they gain new knowledge through active co-construction. Integrating learning experiences into the work environment can help training become more memorable and easier to apply. One example is implementing training on technology or documentation tools as they are being used in context. Participation New employees need opportunities to participate in the environment as they are learning and to experience the emotions and culture of the role. Observation time is important, and being an active team member early on is also important. Organization and the Environment Intentional planning of the way in which employees will interact with the space makes learning more fluid. Some ideas include: making sure that the resources needed for tasks are in functional locations, having deadlines for documentation or responding to family communications built into the daily schedule, and modeling intentional care for children by demonstrating deliberate care for the space. Thoughtfully organize adult materials and create a welcoming, inviting environment for adults and children. Leadership Insight: Apply what you know about Learning and environments The same principles of guiding the learning and independence of children in the educational environment can be applied when helping new staff to move beyond understanding their role to actively embodying their role on your early care and education team. This process can be applied using the early education and care philosophies that are most important to you and relevant to your leadership context. Reflecting on the philosophical and curricular choices you have made for your program and why you chose them can help you think about how you may want to apply those approaches for adult learning. This strategy works because it is integrated and intentional, and it builds skills by modeling skills in the “real world” context to make them stick. Resources for Further Exploration Scuole E Nindi D’Infanzia, Institutionzione del Comune di Reggio Emilia. (N.D). Reggio Emelia Approach. Reggiochildren.it, https://www.reggiochildren.it/en/reggio-emilia-approach/ Beirmeier, M. (2015). Inspired by Reggio Emilia: Emergent Curriculum in Relationship-Driven Learning Environments. Young Children, 70(5), https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/nov2015/emergent-curriculum Schlieber, M. & McLean, C. (2020). Educator Work Environments Are Children’s Learning Environments: How and Why They Should Be Improved. Sequel, January 21, 2020. https://cscce.berkeley.edu/blog/educator-work-environments-are-childrens-learning-environments-how-and-why-they-should-be-improved/ Citations Scuole E Nindi D’Infanzia, Institutionzione del Comune di Reggio Emilia. (N.D). Values. Reggiochildren.it, https://www.reggiochildren.it/en/reggio-emilia-approach/ Talan, T., Masterson, M., & Bella, J. (2023, April 4). Whole leadership: A framework for early childhood programs – 2023. Whole Leadership: A Framework for Early Childhood Programs – 2023 | McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership.
Show More