A 140 Years of Story: The Evolution of an Institute

Lisa M. Downey • August 20, 2025
A woman wearing glasses and a suit is smiling in front of a flag.

Sim Loh is a family partnership coordinator at Children’s Village, a nationally-accredited Keystone 4 STARS early learning and school-age enrichment program in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, serving about 350 children. She supports children and families, including non-English speaking families of immigrant status, by ensuring equitable access to education, health, employment, and legal information and resources on a day-to-day basis. She is a member of the Children First Racial Equity Early Childhood Education Provider Council, a community member representative of Philadelphia School District Multilingual Advisory Council, and a board member of Historic Philadelphia.


Sim explains, “I ensure families know their rights and educate them on ways to speak up for themselves and request for interpretation/translation services. I share families’ stories and experiences with legislators and decision-makers so that their needs are understood. Attending Leadership Connections will help me strengthen and grow my skills in all domains by interacting with and hearing from experienced leaders in different positions. With newly acquired skills, I seek to learn about the systems level while paying close attention to the accessibility and barriers of different systems and resources and their impacts on young children and their families.”

A table showing the comparison of pre and post intervention of fas scores

Copyright © Dimensions Educational Research Foundation All rights reserved. A single copy of these materials may be reprinted for noncommercial personal use only. Visit exchangepress.com or call (800) 221-2864.

by Lisa M. Downey


Elizabeth Harrison once said, “There is nothing great accomplished in this world without faith in its greatness.”


Harrison, an educator and advocate for the kindergarten movement in the United States, settled in Chicago in 1885 and worked alongside other visionary women of the time to create a training school for kindergarten teachers and mothers that, at the time, was a truly radical idea. The prevailing thought of the day was that children should not attend school until they were at least 6 years of age. In the U.S., due to poverty and a gross lack of child labor laws, children were usually engaged in farming, industry, or other work-based activities within the home. Also, in the late 1800’s, most teachers were white men. Further, it was commonly believed that, if you were wealthy, a woman’s place was in the home and in support of society through philanthropic activities. If you were not wealthy, you were likely working in factories, farms, or other domestic forms of employment. The idea that women would be teachers was ludicrous to some. Harrison sought to change that, by empowering women and mothers to connect with their children in ways that were play based, focused on holistic development, and based on the theories and practices of Owen, Pestalozzi, Froebel, and Montessori.

In 1891, Miss Harrison’s Training School was incorporated as the Chicago Kindergarten College. Harrison had very strict requirements for her students. She required a high school diploma, and her program was three years in length. Harrison is often credited with being one of the first to maintain high standards and uniform training for teachers in early childhood. Later, in 1930, Harrison’s College became the National College of Education, introducing the first four-year training program for teachers in Illinois. The College eventually evolved into the present-day National Louis University (NLU), an urban institution that focuses on innovation, access, excellence, and equity. Today, NLU embodies Elizabeth Harrison’s spirit in many ways, from maintaining high standards of excellence to finding ways to innovate, despite the changing tides of society, resources, and political ideologies.


Elizabeth Harrison is the reason I came to NLU as a young professional seeking a master’s degree. After being a childcare center director for a number of years, I saw the difficulties facing our workforce and programs across Chicago, and I wanted to make a difference. I enrolled at NLU after researching my options in Chicago and decided on NLU after learning about Harrison. After Harrison’s death, a close friend and correspondent of hers said, “Her keen sense of justice made her staunch in defense of what she believed was right.” I thought, “This place seems to have change in its DNA—I want to be a part of that.”


When I was ready to leave direct service behind, I went in search of training opportunities to help me plan my next step. It was then that I came across a training course being offered by the McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership at National Louis University, aptly called “Next Step”. NLU again.


During that training I met Dr. Paula Jorde Bloom, the founder of the Center for Early Childhood Leadership. Jorde Bloom started the Center in 1985 in an effort to identify, define, and support the competencies of early childhood program administrators and to bring credibility to the importance and complexity of the administrator’s role. While I was taking the Next Step training, Paula passed along two important lessons. The first was that advocacy takes on all forms—it can be in your face and loud, or it can be quieter and more systematic. The second was that when you diffuse your work across many areas of focus it becomes diluted. She told me to find my passion and stick with it—I would make more impact that way.


Wise Words


My training with Dr. Jorde Bloom and the Center led me to eventually becoming an ECE faculty member at NLU. I chose NLU for my next professional home because I knew what was at the heart of NLU—the mission and vision of Elizabeth Harrison. I also knew that focusing on preparing the next generation of teachers and leaders in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) would speak to Paula’s advice for me. I could focus on where my passions lie and where I thought I could enact the most change.


Paula Jorde Bloom once said, “A problem is simply the gap between what is desired and what currently exists.” During my years at NLU as faculty and an Associate Dean, I began to see a pattern. We could train and graduate countless professionals, but the landscape remained the same. Teacher turnover continued to be high. Wages continued to be subpar, and accessible preparation opportunities for the field were in low supply. Further, there did not seem to be much research or discussion about how to support a troubled and flailing field. An idea began to take shape and bloom.


Because of our prominence and collective work in the field of ECEC, a group of us at NLU began talking about how to better impact the profession in lasting ways that could help address the ills of the landscape we found ourselves in. Our first goal was to bring all the ECEC assets at NLU under one figurative umbrella to create a more dynamic impact on the field. We needed to get everyone together in the same room and on the same page. As a result, we recognized that it is not enough to train teachers and leaders, we must continue to cultivate the landscape through applied research, community and policy engagement, and innovation that drives excellence for our entire profession.


These early talks led to the birth of a new enterprise at NLU. Thanks to generous funding from the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, The McCormick Institute for Early Childhood was launched in the academic year 2024–2025.


“The next era for the ECEC profession has arrived.”


Personally, I was thrilled to be named to the position of Executive Director, as it allowed me to contribute to the rich legacy of ECEC-related work at NLU, and if I got to walk in the footsteps of Elizabeth Harrison and Paula Jorde Bloom— even better!


Today NLU trains and prepares more ECEC professionals than any other institution in Illinois. The Center for Early Childhood Leadership is the flagship program of the Institute and is nationally recognized as the premier organization for advancing leaders as levers of quality in ECEC. This year, the Institute will launch an applied research agenda designed to impact the preparation, sustainment, and advancement of the profession. We will also use our research to engage community partners, advocates, and policy makers as we work to create lasting change for the profession that positively impacts children, families and communities. We will continue to lead innovation for the field of ECEC with programming that pushes the limits of what has been thought to be standard practice for the preparation of our field, while focusing on those areas of preparation where there are the most critical gaps and needs.


The next era for the ECEC profession has arrived. The McCormick Institute for Early Childhood at National Louis University is excited to be a vital part of the continued conversation. So am I.


References


Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. (2024, December 23). Kindergarten. Encyclopædia Britannica. britannica.com/ topic/kindergarten


Harrison, E. (1922). The Unseen Side of Child Life: For the Guardians of Young Children. Elizabeth Harrison’s Writings. 4. digitalcommons.nl.edu


Snyder, A. (n.d.). Dauntless Women in Early Childhood Education: 1856–1931. ERIC. files.eric.ed.gov


University, N. L. (n.d.). National Louis University: Our history. National Louis University. nl.edu


Dr. Lisa Downey is the Executive Director of the McCormick Institute for Early Childhood at National Louis University (NLU), where she oversees all programming and operations. She leads a team of 75 staff dedicated to advancing the Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) profession through leadership, applied research, community and policy engagement, and innovative professional preparation. With over 35 years of experience in the field, Dr. Downey’s career includes roles as a toddler classroom teacher, child care center director, Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R) resource developer, training coordinator, and Director of Provider Services at Illinois Action for Children, where she managed CCR&R professional development for the Chicago area. She has been a faculty member at NLU for more than 14 years. Today, Dr. Downey focuses on addressing the complex challenges facing the ECEC workforce, creating scalable solutions that support the profession and ensure children, families, and communities thrive now and in the future.

© 2025 Dimensions Educational Research Foundation. All rights reserved. Exchange Press is an initiative of Dimensions Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Learn more at exchangepress.com.


Read the article on Exchange's website

By Yvonne Williams October 7, 2025
by yvonne williams “The idea of mixed-age groups, the notion of a blended family that’s born out of a family childcare program where you are around people… you learn from the older [children], and you get to interact with younger” (Williams, 2023, pp. 75-76). Family Child Care (FCC) programs are unique in their ability to care for children of varied ages in the same learning environments. Research has noted that blending children of different ages, including siblings, and using a home-based child care supports the development of building social skills and the ability to self-regulate; together they are key for preparing for school (e.g., Porter et.al., 2010; Williams, 2023). These arrangements create environments where children naturally support and learn from one another throughout the day, enriching the overall learning atmosphere and building critical foundations for future learning. The ability to offer mixed-age group care and education offers families a number of advantages: siblings remain together in one familiar setting, parents and the provider are able to sustain a long-term partnership, and families gain a sense of extended support by developing rich relationships with other children and families in the program. Mixed-age environments naturally allow older children to take on leadership roles. Younger children benefit from this by observing and learning new skills. All children gain from interacting with peers at various developmental stages, while also experiencing continuity of care with the provider. Since the FCC provider remains both educator and caregiver for many years, they also experience important benefits: deeper relationships with children, less pressure to constantly enroll and onboard new families, and a stronger sense of community with families. The capacity to offer care to mixed age groups is anchored in the FCC environment, a cornerstone of quality in home-based care. I saw this firsthand in my own research, which identified three foundational pillars for effective FCC programs: the provider, the business, and the environment. (Williams, 2023). An intentionally structured environment that safely accommodates mixed ages is often foundational to high-quality family child care, not an afterthought. Although there are many benefits to mixed-age groups, managing mixed-age groups presents unique challenges for FCC providers. These include balancing the developmental needs of children at different stages, ensuring appropriate supervision, and creating an inclusive learning environment that caters to all age groups. Providers often report that the organizational structure of FCC settings, such as mixed-age groups and balancing multiple roles, can be perceived as challenges when implementing responsive feeding and other evidence-based practices. Technical Assistants (TA) play a vital role in supporting FCC providers by offering personalized strategies and resources to address the complexities of mixed-age group settings. The most helpful technical assistance comes when people ask many questions instead of being told what to do. This helps them learn, try things out, and grow independently. I recently returned from leading a Transformative Technical Assistance (TTA) institute in New York, where a colleague and I provided training to specialists who coach both family child care and center-based programs. At our TTA Institute , we emphasize that TAs should ask insightful questions instead of immediately giving answers. This approach nudges providers into deeper thinking and gives them ownership, allowing them to uncover strategies that truly matter to them and stick over time. Below are three broad topics related to mixed-age groups, reframed as open-ended questions to help providers think deeply, act with intention, and create solutions tailored to their own programs. When asking your questions, make sure to frame open-ended questions in ways that will help the provider reflect on their practice, explore possibilities, adapt what they do, and grow stronger rather than simply accept someone else’s fixed advice. Here are three areas that include questions that may be helpful when supporting family child care professionals: Implementing Developmentally Appropriate Practices To help a provider explore ways to support their routines and interactions to meet the diverse developmental stages of children in mixed-age groups, you might ask: In what parts of your daily schedule do you see infants’ developmental needs being limited by the group dynamics or materials used? This is especially helpful when working with a provider who cares for infants along with older children. How might you adapt daily transitions or caregiving routines (feeding, diapering/toileting, naps) so that infants’ developmental needs are better honored, while also supporting the older children in the same mixed-age group? Enhancing Classroom Management To brainstorm strategies to maintain a harmonious and productive environment that accommodates various age groups, you might ask: In what ways could you change your interactions, routines, or choice of materials so that infants experience less stress and fewer behavioral challenges, while older children remain engaged and valued every day? How might you design the physical layout or daily schedule so infants have freedom to explore safely, and older children can participate in age-appropriate activities without causing overload or disruption? Promoting Inclusive Practices To examine practices that ensure that all children, regardless of age or ability, have access to meaningful learning experiences, you might ask: How might you adapt your daily routines and caregiving interactions so that every infant, regardless of ability or background, feels included, valued, and has opportunities to explore and learn? What changes could you make to the materials, space, and interactions in your infant room so that infants at different developmental stages, with varied needs, or who speak other languages can all participate meaningfully? By embedding these strategies that lead to rich dialogue and discovery, Technical Assistants help providers create learning environments that are both engaging and responsive, ones that truly foster growth and development for all children. As the landscape of early childhood education continues to evolve, ongoing support through TA remains essential in promoting the success and sustainability of Family Child Care programs. References Porter, T., Paulsell, D., Del Grosso, P., Avellar, S., Haas, R., & Vuong, L. (2010). A review of the literature on home-based child care: Implications for future directions, Princeton, N.J.: Mathematica Policy Research Report . Williams, Y. S. (2023). Exploring attitudes of four groups of stakeholders toward family childcare and recommending best practices to promote positive experiences (Doctoral dissertation). National Louis University.
Show More