Taking Small Steps to Strengthen Program Impact: Making the Most of Pedagogical Leadership

This document may be printed, photocopied, and disseminated freely with attribution. All content is the property of the McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership.

With increased stress experienced by families emerging from the pandemic and early childhood programs scrambling to meet staff needs, leaders need key strategies to balance their time and energy. What steps can they take to strengthen early childhood programs? How can they get ahead of daily interruptions and create a plan to pull staff together around quality improvement goals?


An important guide to leading positive change lies in the foundational competencies of whole leadership, McCormick Center’s framework for success in early childhood programs. The framework provides an overview of leadership areas and highlights the interdependent relationship that exists between each part. It includes the work of pedagogical leadership, which prioritizes family engagement and focuses on the critical impacts of supporting children’s learning and development through high-quality teaching. The framework also addresses administrative leadership, which includes all the ways leaders plan for and manage the program operations, strategic planning, advocacy, and interactions with the community that make family engagement and teaching effective.


Leadership essentials anchor administrative and pedagogical priorities and address the foundational competencies and behaviors necessary for relationship building and motivating people to achieve shared goals. Essentials include culturally responsive leadership, continuous quality improvement, and personal and professional awareness. Reflective and intentional practice are the hallmarks of leadership essentials.


A key priority for all programs is culturally responsive leadership, which values and builds on the strengths and contributions of each person, culture, and the unique assets of each community. In this way, the three areas of whole leadership work together to create a vital and thriving program.


To provide equitable access to high-quality care and learning experiences, leaders also need to incorporate developmentally appropriate practice, which offers a roadmap to foster children’s joyful learning with opportunities for each and every child to achieve their full potential. Developmentally appropriate practice builds on children’s natural motivation by creating a sense of belonging, purpose, and self-agency. Teachers provide for equity, incorporate family contexts, and make teaching decisions that are in the best interest of individual children, as well as of the whole group. Families and children are valued for their strengths and are honored for their unique ways of being. What are some steps leaders can take to get started?


First, begin with families. Family engagement may be pushed to the side to take care of other teaching priorities, such as staffing classrooms, managing illness, working with teachers to arrange classrooms and materials, and supporting children’s behavior and learning. When family engagement is strengthened, it contributes fresh energy, new perspectives, and positive communication that benefits teachers and children. Below are tips to jumpstart communication and planning with staff:


  • Invite teachers to reflect and plan. Set aside regular time for staff communication about family goals and priorities. Identify hidden barriers that may prevent families from full participation in the program and in decision-making related to their children. With teachers, set action steps that lead to tangible goals that can strengthen family engagement. To do this, ask teachers, “What positive strategies do you use with families to seek information about their expectations and priorities for children?” “What approaches have been successful in your interactions with families?” “What challenges or barriers have you experienced that we can discuss and evaluate?” “What support do you wish you had related to families?” Seek research-based resources from the National Association for the Education for Young Children (NAEYC) that can guide discussion and goal setting.

 

  • Create multiple opportunities for family feedback. Use a comprehensive family survey that is revisited periodically to explore family child-rearing practices, unique developmental priorities, and preferences. Ask families to provide feedback about the handbook and other program policies and materials to be sure responsibilities and opportunities are relevant and understood. Invite families to participate in program boards and committees and to review program goals and priorities.

 

  • Focus on reciprocal communication. Plan scheduled family conferences to invite two-way, ongoing conversation. The goal is to focus on children’s strengths, with opportunities for families and teachers to work together to support development and learning. Explore resources that can jumpstart staff conversations and practices.

 

  • Connect families. Bring families together around common interests and concerns, such as inviting a local pediatrician to answer questions about sleep, nutrition, or child guidance. Facilitate in-person or Zoom meetings that invite families to contribute to cultural activities, gardening, reading, crafting, music, and art projects. Families can organize clothing drives, facilitate nature walks and outdoor activities, or create an art gallery or mural in a hallway or classroom.

 

  • Plan learning experiences that reflect children’s lives. Encourage teachers to try new ways to build on the daily experiences of children. Select picture books, posters, and other materials with objects and activities children recognize. Teachers can ask children, “How does your family do this at home?” “How do you help your family?” “What do you do that is like this child in the story?” Materials for dramatic play, images, and artwork should serve as mirrors and windows to reflect the children’s language and cultures and introduce them to new places and perspectives. Invite families to share songs, record lullabies, and read stories in home languages.

 

  • Focus on curriculum. Encourage teachers to discuss priorities for the classroom. If you participate in a state or local quality improvement system, be sure teachers have a classroom copy of the environment rating scales, assessment tools, and state standards. Ask staff, “What is working well for you?” “In what area do you need support?” “What topics would you like to explore?” Check out the NAEYC book and article selections that relate directly to the development of children and play-based learning. Encourage teachers to reflect on recent experiences and celebrate strengths and accomplishments.


Small steps taken over time to strengthen pedagogical leadership will result in positive change across the organization. Begin with one strategy and set specific and achievable goals. Ask teachers what they need most from professional training and leadership support. Ask families how they would like to be included and contribute in meaningful ways. Offer resources to help teachers gain new insights into their influence in the lives of children and families. The result will be a vital learning community that is rewarding and empowering for all.


Marie Masterson, Ph.D., is the senior director of quality assessment at the McCormick Center for Early Childhood Leadership. She holds a doctorate in early childhood education, is a licensed teacher, and is a national speaker and author of many books and articles that address research-based, practical skills for high-quality teaching, behavior guidance, quality improvement, and leadership. She is a contributing author and editor of the book, Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children Birth Through Age Eight, Fourth Edition.

By Robyn Kelton, M.A. June 27, 2025
INTRODUCTION Turnover rates in child care are among the highest in education, with over 160,000 workforce openings predicted annually (Bassok et al., 2014; Doromal et al., 2022; Joughin, 2021; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025). While some turnover is expected and even necessary, the levels of turnover experienced in the field of early childhood education and care (ECEC) are not only alarmingly high but deeply problematic. In 2021, a national survey conducted by the National Association for the Education of Young Children found that over 80% of child care centers were experiencing a staffing shortage, with the majority of those programs reporting one-to-five open roles, but 15% reporting between six and 15 open roles (NAEYC, 2021). Staffing shortages result in lost revenue, financial uncertainty, and program instability, often forcing administrators to operate below capacity and/or under reduced hours (NAEYC, 2021; NAEYC, 2024; Zero to Three, 2024). Limited enrollment slots and classroom and program closures lead to increased waiting lists (Zero to Three, 2024; Carrazana, 2023). In turn, families are placed in a highly vulnerable position of needing to leave the workforce to stay home with their child or turn to potentially unsafe or unregulated child care. Moreover, increased turnover in classrooms interrupts continuity of care and disrupts the relationships built between children and their educators (Reidt-Parker, J., & Chainski, M. J. (2015). Research has begun to highlight some of the programmatic and personnel characteristics predictive of increased staff turnover in ECEC programs. Low wages are most commonly identified as a strong predictor of turnover (Amadon et al., 2023; Bryant et al., 2023; Fee, 2024; Guevara, 2022; Totenhagen et al., 2016). However, workforce advocates and some researchers have begun to expand conversations on compensation to explore the impact the profession’s general lack of benefits such as paid time off, access to health insurance, and retirement benefits has on retention (e.g., Amadon et al., 2023; Bryant et al., 2023; Fee, 2024; Lucas, 2023). While informative, this body of work has typically approached benefits as binary variables (i.e., have or do not have) rather than reflect the spectrum on which benefits are commonly offered (e.g., the number of days off, the percent of insurance covered by the employer, and levels of retirement matching funds). This Research Note aims to expand on previous work investigating the relationship between benefits and turnover by exploring the possibility of a more nuanced relationship between the variables to determine if the level of benefits offered impacts turnover rates. METHOD This study used data collected via formal Program Administration Scale, 3rd Edition (PAS-3) assessments conducted by Certified PAS-3 Assessors between 2023 and 2025. To become certified, PAS-3 assessors must first achieve reliability (a score of at least 86%) on a test conducted after four days of training on the tool. Next, they must conduct two PAS assessments within three months of reliability training. PAS-3 national anchors reviewed the completed assessments for consistency, accuracy, and completeness. The study analyzed data from 133 PAS-3 assessments collected during the certification process across 12 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Mariana Islands.  Measures Data for this study were collected using the PAS-3, a valid and reliable tool used to measure and improve Whole Leadership practices in center-based programs (Talan, Bella, Jorde Bloom, 2022). The PAS-3 includes 25 items, each composed of 2-5 indicator strands and scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = inadequate, 3 = minimal, 5 = good, and 7 = excellent). Item scores are averaged to determine a mean PAS-3 score. Of particular interest to this study is Item 5: Benefits. Item 5 measures employee access to health insurance and considers what percentage of the cost is paid by the employer, the total number of paid time off days within the first and fifth years of employment, access to a retirement plan, and the percentage at which the employer will match the employee’s contribution. Last, Item 5 explores provisions made to cover the costs of staff’s professional development. Non-applicable is allowed as a response for indicators related to health insurance and retirement if there are no full-time staff employed by the program. Sample Program enrollment ranged in size from four children to 285, with a mean enrollment of 65 and a median of 55. Total program staff for the sample ranged from two to 44 staff, with an average of just under 14 staff (13.93) and a standard deviation of 8.80. Table 1 below provides a detailed breakdown of staff by role and full-time and part-time status.
Show More